Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] boundary crosses<br/>
Date: Jan 04, 2001 @ 01:01<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1193.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1203.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1187.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1193.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1195.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-748186598">thanx  brendan  as always<br/>
<br/>
2 or 3 of these in the world is plenty<br/>
come to think of it<br/>
<br/>
is there a photo available of this one<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;I have the maps, I have done the site inspection and interviewed the guilty.<br/>
&gt;There is only one quadpoint in Baarle, The others are VERY near to it,<br/>
&gt;connections only one or more metres wide, but they are not points.<br/>
&gt;There MAY be a quadpoint in Cooch Behar, but in the 1930s it was in the<br/>
&gt;middle of a river, and I only have a 1930s 1-inch map to base this on. Again<br/>
&gt;it may be a larger or smaller connection than a point (ie a non point, or no<br/>
&gt;connection at all). The other 2 are confirmed points (Jungholz, Baarle).<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Brendan </span></blockquote></div>