Subject: boundary crosses<br/>
Date: Jan 04, 2001 @ 17:31<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1194.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic1187.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1202.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1204.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1943789616">multi thanx & kudos  brendan<br/>
<br/>
just to keep the boundary crosses hott<br/>
while looking forward to a photo<br/>
what about the cobblestone cross<br/>
  was i just imagining that<br/>
<br/>
& was jesper then not right in his recent call<br/>
<br/>
this was the same as my guess based on a 1960s map<br/>
<br/>
but now we seem to be in different place that was created in 1995<br/>
<br/>
can you clarify any of this<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
& can we zero in any farther cartographically or legalistically on the<br/>
bengal wetpoint candidate<br/>
<br/>
it would be nice if we did or could prove to own a global tricross here<br/>
<br/>
we might even be able to think this one into being<br/>
<br/>
good training for an eventual bwnazmzw maneuver perhaps<br/>
<br/>
amphibiously<br/>
m</div>