Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Geographic anomalies<br/>
Date: Dec 30, 2000 @ 18:03<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1133.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1141.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1126.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1133.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1135.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-401162977">arif & mats earlier<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;&gt; I don&#39;t think it is an integral part of France.  If it<br/>
&gt;&gt; was, I would consider it an exclave as St Pierre et<br/>
&gt;&gt; Miquelon&#39;s territorial waters are surrounded by<br/>
&gt;&gt; Canadian water, which is very rare.<br/>
&gt;&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.st-pierre-et-miquelon.com/english.html">http://www.st-pierre-et-miquelon.com/english.html</a> is a<br/>
&gt;&gt; good site.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Just a short comment; on the above-mentioned site there<br/>
&gt;is some information referring to St P et M as a<br/>
&gt;&quot;CollectivitÈ Territoriale&quot; and not an overseas<br/>
&gt;department, such as for example Guadelope and Reunion.<br/>
&gt;See <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.st-pierre-et-miquelon.com/Domtom.html">http://www.st-pierre-et-miquelon.com/Domtom.html</a><br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>yes this is a little strange<br/>
perhaps a new wrinkle since my 1997 info<br/>
which left me pretty sure it was a full department<br/>
as it was also said to be when i last visited there<br/>
<br/>
so it might be only a ghost enclave or quasi enclave by some definition<br/>
<br/>
still st pierre actually looked & felt much more like the real france than<br/>
did cayenne or st martin for example<br/>
<br/>
m</div>