9411. armook revisited
      http://topozone.com/map.asp?lat=36.5&lon=-94.62&s=25&symshow=n shows the situation of the tripoint & in view of all the questions raised in the improbable but
      Mar 20, 2003 @ 19:15 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
9596. armook revisited
      In message #9441, Michael discussed various possible options on how the marker got where it now is located. The attached picture of Joyce Parsell and Clark
      Apr 05, 2003 @ 22:59 - jparsell ("jparsell" <jparsell@northnet.org>)
9605. Re: armook revisited
      thanx jack very interesting analysis & it is gratifying to see all our agreement nice ultimate question too of whether the original 1823 rock is still all
      Apr 06, 2003 @ 12:48 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)