1. Fw: [BoundaryPoint] Re: St Pierre et Miquelon
    ***RESEND*** Well, I checked out the only map available locally, a 1:250,000 topo -- and I can t tell. I ve ordered the 1:50,000 version, and it will be in
    Dec 06, 2002 @ 03:39 - Doug Murray ("Doug Murray" <doug@dougmurrayproductions.com>)
  2. Fw: [BoundaryPoint] Re: St Pierre et Miquelon
    i dont think we have a good enough map yet to get a reliable answer by just taking the turning point data & drawing the lines but i did at least review the
    Dec 06, 2002 @ 10:11 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  3. Fw: [BoundaryPoint] Re: St Pierre et Miquelon
    ... that ... islets ... It is a bit confusing that in the 1972 (not 1974, as I wrote earlier on) text there are two lost children : the one with the article
    Dec 06, 2002 @ 11:30 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  4. Fw: [BoundaryPoint] Re: St Pierre et Miquelon
    ... belonging to ... Canadian ... right & interesting tho i think we havent confused them more below ... the ... be ... these ... one ... its low ... further
    Dec 06, 2002 @ 13:53 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)