- but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
yikes i have been so gulled into thinking we are dealing with a set of normal boundaries here at eglysd & that they will be behaving like any others like for
Jan 11, 2006 @ 03:25 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
aha & far better we just ask the egypt border force if it happens to have gps era survey data on this southernmost egly marker at any level of exactitude &
Jan 11, 2006 @ 03:36 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
While you re corresponding with them, couldn t you just ask if there is an official datum for the delimited but undemarcated portions of the EGLY boundary and
Jan 11, 2006 @ 05:32 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
thanxx i appreciate the question no less than the critical review behind it but first with regard to the egsd signs all indications thus far are that they date
Jan 11, 2006 @ 16:06 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
... displacement both potentially & typically i believe is in the longitude rather than the latitude
Jan 11, 2006 @ 16:42 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
thank you thank hugh huge thanxx & hugs & a few intertwingles follow ... you are right a general statement cant be made if you drag the exceedingly anomalous &
Jan 11, 2006 @ 18:04 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
& actually this whole excursion into datum shifts will prove unnecessary if we can get our southernmost egly rock coords in wgs84 in which case the latitudinal
Jan 11, 2006 @ 18:44 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
Boiling it down to actual numbers: Points defined using the datums typically used in Egypt are approximately 130m meridianally distant and 117m lattitudinally
Jan 11, 2006 @ 18:50 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
Not necessarily - different datums do not give rise to absolutely parallel lines of longitude and lattitude when compared with each other. They are generally
Jan 11, 2006 @ 18:57 - Hugh Wallis ("Hugh Wallis" <hugh@...>)
- Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
in this you are both absolutely correct & right on point as well for if we found the southernmost egly rock to be 10 meters off the wgs84 25th meridian then
Jan 11, 2006 @ 19:11 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
- Re: but why suppose an eglysd datum has ever been stated or even can be synthesized
hugh & lowell & anyone else who is still following the bouncing ball & eglysd tripoint try i have just ordered up uconns copy of brownlie again which usually
Jan 12, 2006 @ 20:35 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)