Subject: new inpk map & cninpk in the news etc<br/>
Date: May 06, 2003 @ 19:31<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9879.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9954.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9867.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9952.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9954.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-392120768"><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.keralanext.com/news/index.asp?id=10337">http://www.keralanext.com/news/index.asp?id=10337</a><br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002&quot; <br/>
&lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cmc.sandia.gov/Links/about/papers/SAND980505-20/">http://www.cmc.sandia.gov/Links/about/papers/SAND980505-20/</a><br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; SAND98-0505-20.htm<br/>
&gt; includes maps showing <br/>
&gt; among other inpk details <br/>
&gt; the relationship between 2 of the possible versions of cninpk<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; the second of these maps even indicates a small area along <br/>
&gt; inpk that neither country evidently claims<br/>
&gt; & that presumably therefore no country in the world claims<br/>
&gt; the first such reported or purported spot of everyones land <br/>
&gt; anywhere on dry ground outside the antarctic treaty zone<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; but i have seen so many different versions of the disputed inpk <br/>
 </span></blockquote>& <br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; cnin boundaries <br/>
&gt; both de jure & de facto<br/>
&gt; that i would have little confidence in any supposed tripoint <br/>
&gt; position claims in this area at this time </span></blockquote></div>