Subject: Re: kurdistan map<br/>
Date: Apr 11, 2003 @ 14:20<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9655.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic9651.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9655.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9657.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1438020893">if the kurds had their way<br/>
we might get 30 or 40 new claves too<br/>
based on the green & white areas in chriss map<br/>
<br/>
& if we were to do a kurdocentric punctoscopy<br/>
based on the present reality <br/>
say proceeding along the lines of our recent bascocentric one<br/>
we would find & count at least several entirely kurdish provinces <br/>
not only in iraq but also in iran syria armenia azerbaijan & <br/>
especially turkey<br/>
& we would find in present kurdistan far more multipoints & <br/>
multiplexity than in present euskal herria<br/>
<br/>
for we are considering chunks of not just 2 or even 4 countries <br/>
any longer but 6 countries now<br/>
so our survey would be extremely complicated<br/>
in terms of whether to observe extant international borders<br/>
or whether to include partly kurdish provinces <br/>
etc etc<br/>
& ultimately far more difficult & arbitrary than the basque survey<br/>
which would come off looking tame by comparison <br/>
<br/>
but besides that<br/>
there are already at least 2 completely kurdish tricountry points <br/>
meaning completely within the green areas on that map<br/>
not to mention jespers observation about what might happen in <br/>
future that could create new multipoints<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
so anyway<br/>
all that may be neither here nor there so far <br/>
but <br/>
come to mention it<br/>
why not let the kurds have their way<br/>
<br/>
indeed why not let everyone have their way<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;anorak222&quot; <br/>
&lt;listen@w...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; <br/>
 </span></blockquote>&lt;jesniel@i...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; Why didn&#39;t the Peace Conference reward the Kurds?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Four nations would have to give up territory. They don&#39;t like it.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; What&#39;s in it for the Turks not to reward the Kurds apart from <br/>
 </span></blockquote>loss of teritory and perhaps tention in Iran?<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; Loss of territory.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;Isn&#39;t it anyway mostly desert?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; No.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;And it would solve the Kurdish problem.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; The problem, from the Turkish point of view, is exactly that <br/>
 </span></blockquote>someone wants them to let go part of their country.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; Regards </span></blockquote></div>