Subject: Re: kurdistan map<br/>
Date: Apr 11, 2003 @ 10:41<br/>
Author: anorak222 (&quot;anorak222&quot; &lt;listen@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9652.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9656.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9651.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9654.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9656.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1222356036">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; &lt;jesniel@i...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Why didn&#39;t the Peace Conference reward the Kurds?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Four nations would have to give up territory. They don&#39;t like it.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; What&#39;s in it for the Turks not to reward the Kurds apart from loss of teritory and perhaps tention in Iran?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Loss of territory.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;Isn&#39;t it anyway mostly desert?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>No.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;And it would solve the Kurdish problem.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>The problem, from the Turkish point of view, is exactly that someone wants them to let go part of their country.<br/>
<br/>
Regards</div>