You may, of course write what you please. It has been noted that in
this group you don't get killed for being a little off-topic. Though
it is frowed upon, and those swaying off seem to be conscious of
guilt, with frequent apologies. By soliloquy I didn't meen monologue,
as understood by most; of course all postings are monoloques. By
soliloquy I meant to note the lengthiness and unneccesity of speach.
The auther of the speach that I singled out to "attack" admits to
enjoy abuse of language, in his words, more than much else. And his
speaches are usually, for his own enjoyment, long and fluffy, and
most likely not very understandable to those foreign members that
don't master the English language. Perhaps writing literature would
be a better use of his talent. See, when we go off-topic to talk
about other things, at least those discussing are interested in what
they're writing. But I haven't evere said anything about that. What I
am addressing not the first time is the unneccesity of some of the
speaches of one of our moderators at all. Like the one that
I "attacked" was unneccesary at all, or if someone sees it neccesary,
it could have gone into few simple sentences. Such expanded fluffy
speaches I think are interesting to few and they're about nothing,
and therefore a total waste of time (there are some busy members here
who don't appreciate that). But since most members, at least deciding
form responses received, enjoy such byproducts of someone elses
literary enjoyment, (a good deal, two down by one shot) never you
mind anything I said at all, for I thought I represented majority,
but seemingly was wrong and being minority must respect the majority.