Subject: Re: Condominium Island
Date: Feb 10, 2003 @ 15:40
Author: acroorca2002 <orc@orcoast.com> ("acroorca2002 <orc@...>" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> There are still things that puzzle me about the island. Forexample,
> we had it established that the island is a condominium, and thatthe
> Bidasoa is a boundary river between marker no. 1 and the mouth ofthe
> river (where it meets the second condominium), i.e. with a normalthis
> thalweg boundary. But I have never seen the implicit outcome of
> situation, that is, that the island is a condominial enclave inprobably because it is so negligible in practical terms it never
> either French or Spanish internal water, mentioned or depicted
> anywhere.
> And an odd situation like this would merit such athe
> mentioning somewhere, I think. Descheemaeker's hand-drawn map, on
> other hand, suggests that the Thalweg boundary is interrupted bythe
> island, and that there is a small bit of condominial water aroundthe
> island (up to the Thalwegs of the two river branches) as well.he might have just been winging it over this difficulty
> But asright
> this situation isn't mentioned anywhere in texts that I've read
> either, the first situation (the island being a dry condominium
> surrounded by French or Spanish - I'd go for Spanish - internal
> waters) is the more probable one.
> Another possibility would be that just before and after the island,again
> the border would leave the Thalweg and head for the extremities of
> the island.
> This would account for the highly ceremonial character ofin
> the island, which is sometimes considered to be a boundary marker
> it's entirety. But this is another wild guess without any back-upin
> writing (that I know of) at all.i still think the whole island would have to be a clave but only for
>
> Peter S.