Subject: Re: Condominium Island<br/>
Date: Feb 07, 2003 @ 17:01<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 &lt;orc@orcoast.com&gt; (&quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@...&gt;&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8952.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8954.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8892.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8952.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8954.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1015249667">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Peter Smaardijk <br/>
&lt;smaardijk@y...&gt;&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@o...&gt;&quot; <br/>
&gt; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Peter Smaardijk <br/>
&gt; &gt; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt;&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Bill Burke&quot; &lt;bill@l...&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; &quot;(...)Does anyone have any more information/ photos on this <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; subject???????????????&quot;<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; The island has been extensively discussed here since msg. 1481. <br/>
&gt; &gt; Just <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; browse through the old messages, and you will find a lot about <br/>
 </span></blockquote>it.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; right<br/>
&gt; &gt; but never before had we gotten into the condominial nitty gritty<br/>
&gt; &gt; & now we even learn of a further variation upon the variable <br/>
 </span></blockquote>regime<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;<br/>
&gt; I was just trying to help. Did I miss this variation? The six <br/>
 </span></blockquote>months <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; terms were also discussed (msg. 1488).<br/>
&gt; Peter S.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>indeed peter you are a great help as always<br/>
<br/>
the further variation we enjoyed this morning was in msg 8948<br/>
re the midway split for royal weddings<br/>
<br/>
clearly this must override the semiannual flipflop</div>