--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk
<smaardijk@y...>" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
can you or anyone confirm or bust this clave report
for upon it of course hinges the question of whether we actually have
a fully articulated octapoint
or a merely septimunicipal one
> Arif Samad wrote:
> "(...)Anyway, what's up with the eighth commune? Did it disappear,
> because the eigth line seems to be different in my map, plus it does
> not show up on 1:160,000 maps while the other seven does show up.
By
> the way, the 1:200,000, 1:160,000 and 1:40,000 maps in the Finnish
> site is based on 1:500,000, 1:400,000 and 1:20,000 map images
> respectively."
>
> The eighth one doesn't figure in my Finnish road atlas, either, but
> with the help of http://opaskartta.turku.fi/index_eng.htm and the
> remark on the other site that Marcel found that the Masku
> municipality part is an enclave (at least that's what I think it
> says), the eighth part must be a detached part of that municipality.
> When comparing all maps we now have here, it makes sense to me.
>
> Hopefully the fragment hasn't been abandoned recently.
>
> Peter S.