Subject: Ukraine - Moldovan border (incl. Palanca)
Date: Jan 31, 2003 @ 15:42
Author: Christian Berghänel (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_Bergh=E4nel?= <christian.berghanel@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next
Prev Post in Time Next
>___________________________________________________________
> RFE/RLNEWSLINE Vol. 7, No. 17, Part II, 28 January 2003
>NOTE
>
> END
>DISPUTE?
> WHY ARE UKRAINE AND MOLDOVA UNABLE TO RESOLVE THEIR BORDER
>first demarcation point on the
> By Taras Kuzio
>
> On 29 January, the
> Moldovan-Ukrainian is expected to beinstalled in Chernivtsi Oblast
> (formerly North Bukovina). Thedemarcation of the entire
> Moldovan-Ukrainian border is expected to takeanother two years to
> complete. In June 1996, delimitation of the1,200-kilometer border
> was based on the administrative borderestablished by the USSR on 4
> November 1940. This resolved 70-80 percentof the delimitation. The
> remaining 20-30 percent took until 1999 tocomplete.
> Why, then, the long delay in the border's demarcation?The
> border dispute between Moldova-Ukraine has always involved morethan
> the issue of territory. The Moldovan village of Palanca islocated
> exactly on the country's border with Ukraine. The Odesa-Renihighway
> runs through the village. When Moldova ceded a 7.7-kilometersection
> of the highway to Ukraine, the village of Palanca waseffectively
> split in two. In exchange, Ukraine initially transferred toMoldova
> 100 square kilometers of land, to be followed by another 1,000square
> kilometers near the mouth of the Danube River. This hasallowed
> Moldova to begin building an oil terminal for the importof
> Azerbaijani oil, thereby reducing its dependency on Russia forenergy
> and earning transit fees for the re-export of oil to othercountries.
> The agreement on the transfer of territory was signedin
> August 1999 after delimitation was completed. But Ukraine refusedto
> withdraw its border troops from the Giurgiulesti region -- thearea
> seceded to Moldova to give it access to the Black Sea -- because"an
> agreement on state borders has not yet been ratified." This, inturn,
> halted the construction of the oil terminal.Communist Party of Moldova (PCM) has always
> The ruling
> supported the territoryexchange. Opposition to it came from the
> Popular Party ChristianDemocratic and other the center-right
> parties. Those parties pointed tothe constitution, which envisages
> making changes in the country'sterritorial integrity only through a
> referendum. In September, theConstitutional Court ruled in response
> to their objections that thetransfer of land was constitutional. A
> Foreign Ministry official pointedout that the highway was not ceded
> but "transmitted into ownership" andthat this "does not harm the
> sovereignty of Moldova."additional factor that complicates the border dispute is
> An
> theTransdniester region. Since coming to power in 2001, the PCM has
> been astaunch advocate of Moldova's territorial integrity, hoping
> that itsclose relations with Russia would lead Moscow to apply
> pressure on theTransdniester separatists to reach an agreement with
> Chisinau. But whileRussia first overtly and then covertly backed the
> Transdniesterseparatists, it has been unable to force them to sit
> down at thenegotiating table.
> Although Russia has shifted its support to theMoldovans
> since the election of the PCM, Ukraine still backs theTransdniester
> separatists. Earlier this month, Ukraine's specialcommissioner to
> the talks, Yevhen Levytsky, tabled a proposal that theTransdniester
> be granted de facto independence "as a republic in itscurrent
> manifestations and characteristics" until a final settlementis
> reached. The proposal envisaged that the Moldovans would desistfrom
> interfering in the Transdniester while providing it with thenew
> customs seals to undertake external trade. Ukraine is also seekingto
> open a consulate in the Transdniester.Vladimir Voronin has become exasperated at
> Moldovan President
> the Transdniester stance andespecially that of its intransigent
> president, Igor Smirnov. Moldovaproposed installing joint
> Moldovan-Ukrainian customs checkpoints on its-- and Transdniester's
> -- border with Ukraine.backed that proposal. Joint checkpoints would,
> The OSCE has
> according to an OSCEdelegation that visited the border in December,
> make it possible "toimprove import- and export-control procedures
> from the Dniester region."But this was precisely the issue that
> neither the Ukrainian orTransdniester sides wanted to resolve, and
> hence they both rejectedjoint checkpoints.
> In 1996, the Moldovans issued eight customs seals forthe
> Transdniester. By 2001, this number had been augmented by anadditional 348 forged customs seals. In September 2001, Moldova
>
> changedits customs seals and thereby deprived the Transdniester of
> thepossibility of "legal" involvement in international trade. The
> Ukrainianside has insisted that the new seals be given to the
> Transdniester. TheMoldovans have also demanded that countries refuse
> to issue visas toresidents of Transdniestr, many of whom have
> Russiancitizenship.
> Voronin has accused Ukrainian officials of involvementin
> illegal smuggling rackets operating out of the Transdniesterand
> through the Ukrainian ports of Odesa and Illichevsk. In both ofthese
> ports, the Transdniester has individuals capable offabricating
> documents facilitating such trade. Ukraine remains the onlyCIS state
> that has not recognized the new Moldovan customsseals.
> One measure of the extent of Transdniester officials'involvement in the smuggling trade is the fact that Smirnov's son
>
> headsthe Transdniester State Customs Committee. The scale of the
> tradeUkraine is facilitating for the Transdniester is evident in the
> 12,000freight rail cars allowed to cross since the new customs seals
> wereintroduced. Late last year, a tape recording made by former
> presidentialsecurity officer Mykola Melnychenko of a conversation
> between UkrainianPresident Leonid Kuchma and Odesa Mayor Ruslan
> Bodelan was releasedpublicly. The tape substantiated allegations by
> Voronin and others ofUkraine's long-standing involvement in
> Transdniester smugglingrackets.
> These smuggling rackets allegedly involve weapons,narcotics,
> metals, oil, gas, cigarettes, and other commodities. AsVoronin
> complained: "We in Moldova have understood that Smirnov is abandit.
> It is not clear who he is for Ukraine." The Transdniester wasthe
> most industrialized region of Moldova, with many factoriesinvolved
> in military production. Since 1992, the region has been forcedto
> create closed production cycles for many of these weapons, suchas
> small arms, mortars, GRAD multiple-missile and grenadelaunchers.
> The Transdniester's involvement in the export of suchweapons
> -- some of which could fall into terrorists' hands -- was onereason
> why the issue was on the agenda during Voronin's December visitto
> the United States, where he met with President George W. Bush.U.S.
> awareness of Ukraine's involvement in the smuggling rackets might,in
> turn, contribute to worsening the already poor relations betweenKyiv
> and Washington.fellow at the Centre for Russian and
>
> Dr. Taras Kuzio is a resident
> East European Studies, Universityof Toronto.
>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Copyright (c) 2003 RFE/RL, Inc.
>All rights reserved.
>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>