Subject: Nagging questions
Date: Jan 10, 2003 @ 23:18
Author: Ernst Stavro Blofeld (Ernst Stavro Blofeld <blofeld_es@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Peers,

Jan Krogh has brought my attention to some
irregularites about marker 110 at Sorgschrofen.

To refresh our memories, we have:
http://images.enclaves.org/jungholz/110_1.jpg
http://images.enclaves.org/jungholz/110_2.jpg
http://images.enclaves.org/jungholz/110_3.jpg
http://images.enclaves.org/jungholz/110_4.jpg

First, Jan asks, what does the bolt set into the rock
mean? Is that perhaps the actual quadripoint, and not
the painted cross? One could imagine, I suppose, that
the first mark in the stone was made through the bolt
by strong mountain men, and that the artists arrived
later with their paintbox. Is the large white area,
with it's black cross, located where it is simply
because there's a surface large and flat enough to
engrave into and paint on?

Jan also points to the strange fact that there are two
white fields. Surely the large white field is big
enough to put an extra initial in, so why bother to
paint an extra smaller one? Especially since the
smaller field seems to be painted on an extremely
paint-unfriendly area of the rock.

And then, the text of the treat cleary states that the
highest peak of the mountain is the critical point.
Then, would that place the quadripoint on top of the
rock? I don't recall seeing antyhing irregular on the
top of the rock, but I didn't look all that carefully,
and unfortunately the images don't reveal anything.

So where is the point? And, indeed, what is the point,
one might wonder... :)

While on the spot I also made the following
observation: On regular boundary stones, poles etc the
initials or coats of arms of the kingdoms, republics,
peoples republics or fiefdoms etc usually face the way
of their owner.

Om marker 110 the little white field with the O
(actually O-umlaut) for Austria is correctly
positioned facing "mainland" Austria, and is, as far
as I can tell, painted on Austrian soil (or rock :).
The D for Germany, however, is also painted on
Austrian soil, namely in Jungholz. German land
protrudes like two narrow triangular shaped areas from
the ground up and the top of the stone and meet in the
cross (or bolt).

Why would the surveyours do what could look as
questionable work on this important spot, while the
rest of the border is so neatly marked with
nice-looking, well maintained and correctly positioned
stones?

Must we, however painful that might be, accept the
fact that most people would actually come for the
view?

M


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com