Subject: Re: the frnl coastal boundary candidate<br/>
Date: Dec 18, 2002 @ 17:59<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 &lt;orc@orcoast.com&gt; (&quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@...&gt;&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8399.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8401.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8391.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8399.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8401.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-653121388">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Peter S<br/>
 <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.captainolivers.com/us/bridge.html">http://www.captainolivers.com/us/bridge.html</a> (as reported in <br/>
 </span></blockquote>msg. <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; 4990).<br/>
&gt; It&#39;s not much, but does it show the boundary?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>it does if locals know<br/>
since who is more local than the goodly captain himself<br/>
<br/>
& it doesnt if the best looking known map is right<br/>
<br/>
quite interesting tho to see how overwhelming appearances are<br/>
& how difficult it is to stand between conflicting ones <br/>
<br/>
but why cant we find this freakin treaty text & settle it</div>