Subject: Re: PLh<br/>
Date: Dec 14, 2002 @ 15:58<br/>
Author: Grant Hutchison &lt;granthutchison@blueyond (&quot;Grant Hutchison &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8344.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8347.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8311.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8344.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8346.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1888700358"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; or would it matter to you if it turned out that the river bed & <br/>
&gt; even the water surface are slightly depressed along thalwegs tho <br/>
&gt; not along median lines<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Well, I&#39;ve been taking the water surface as limiting the lowest <br/>
point, which is pretty standard practice - otherwise the lowest point <br/>
in the USA would be listed as -225m, at the bottom of Lake Superior <br/>
(or even somewhere out on the continental shelf if we consider <br/>
maritime claims).<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; the montecristo tripoint is defined in the tripartite treaty as the <br/>
&gt; cerro or summit<br/>
&gt; per ibs no 82<br/>
 </span></blockquote>This is good. Can you point me at IBS #82, and the others?<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; i may have seen a brgyve pic that confirms your impression of it <br/>
&gt; as being below the summit <br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.woodskunk.addr.com/jbj/biketrip/Pictures/tr13/DCP_0931.JPG">http://www.woodskunk.addr.com/jbj/biketrip/Pictures/tr13/DCP_0931.JPG</a><br/>
(Unless they took a ladder with them, to stand on while they took the <br/>
picture.)<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>