Subject: Re: St Pierre et Miquelon<br/>
Date: Dec 06, 2002 @ 19:46<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8281.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8283.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8222.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8281.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8283.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1975036049">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Doug Murray&quot; &lt;doug@d...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; I have just sent an email to Michael O&#39;Sullivan, the head of the <br/>
 </span></blockquote>International Boundary Commission and the chief field engineer, <br/>
Carl Gustafson.  I&#39;ve asked them about our nagging question as <br/>
to whether there is a dry CAFR boundary.<br/>
<br/>
yikes<br/>
these guys & the ibc are responsible for caus but not cafr or cadk<br/>
tho of course they could know something or someone we dont<br/>
 <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; If there is, then I promise I will travel there next year to <br/>
 </span></blockquote>photograph it... if there is anything to photograph!<br/>
<br/>
yikes again<br/>
these usually fogbound & likely inhospitable rocks may seriously <br/>
test your helicopter & your pilot<br/>
if not yourself & your camera too<br/>
but i dont mean to splash salt water on such a grand project<br/>
<br/>
after all <br/>
the islands nicked by turnpoints 4 & 5 also promise to give us at <br/>
least 2 cafrnf tripoints<br/>
where dry newfound land meets both the french & canadian <br/>
waters</div>