Subject: Re: aznvut puddle<br/>
Date: Oct 27, 2002 @ 19:40<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="7682.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic7681.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7682.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7684.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-722550907">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Bill Hanrahan&quot; &lt;hanrahan@k...&gt; <br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Michael, now I understand why you jumped into Okeechobee <br/>
 </span></blockquote>so easily!<br/>
<br/>
right on bill <br/>
i often do manage to perform my personal submerged lands act <br/>
no matter how mild the provocation<br/>
<br/>
btw wasnt that another interesting link from martin last week on <br/>
the fgdc maritime boundaries of the usa<br/>
<br/>
in fact it considerably advanced my own quest for the exact <br/>
geopositions of our 20 federative territorial waters tripoints<br/>
so as to complete the survey of major american multipoints<br/>
by redirecting my focus from all those inadequate usgs maps <br/>
which had really only tantalized & titillated me thus far anyway<br/>
to the definitive work of the minerals management service <br/>
previously unsuspected by me<br/>
whose geopositioning of the relevant boundaries is shown <br/>
likewise definitively on noaa charts<br/>
which had also been previously overlooked by me<br/>
<br/>
so it seems that all the target info may already exist somewhere<br/>
on individual printed maps at the very least<br/>
& i ought to be able to find the perhaps as many as 20 relevant <br/>
charts in some archive or government map outlet somewhere<br/>
tho i just havent figured out exactly where to apply for the data yet<br/>
since that info doesnt seem to show up on any of those links <br/>
but evidently still needs a bit more digging<br/>
<br/>
ooh<br/>
i cant wait to see the true latxus alflus & prusvi twins especially<br/>
<br/>
yikes<br/>
probably several hundred dollars worth of huge maps to buy tho<br/>
if my limited experience of navigational charts to date is typical <br/>
<br/>
yet<br/>
each such monster will hold but a single tiddle of data for me<br/>
in a huge sea of irrelevancy<br/>
<br/>
how silly is that</div>