----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:17
PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: re
bzgtmx
further clarifications about the tripoint position
based
on this report dated last month
http://belize.centralamerica.com/noticias/detalle.asp?Id=643
first
the
oas & various other parties have already verified the new bzgt
survey
line in its entirety
so
a provisional marker of some sort does
evidently already exist
at the northernmost point
or
bzgtn
also
the parties are aware of the disjunction i anticipated
below
between this emergent bzgtn point & the old bzmxs point
as
already marked by the aguas turbias reference marker
&
this is
indeed considered a problem to be solved
&
the mexicans are on
record as wanting to be as helpful as
possible in the whole process
& will not stand in the way
naturally enough
considering that
they stand only to gain a bit of land here
so
it already seems quite
probable that the new bzgtn point will
soon become recognized by mexico
also as a new bzmxs point
& will thus soon become a fully tripartite
tripoint
> since mexico & belize are not known to have differed
> about the position of the short northsouth survey sector of
bzmx
> separating the mexican state of campeche
> from the
belizean district of orange walk
> a line which still appears until now
at least to have terminated
at
> the same aguas turbias reference
marker
> then
> unless mexico also agrees here to accept a
similarly
minuscule
> land cession or concession from
belize
> the bzgtmx tripoint could well still remain fixed at aguas
turbias
> while bzgt terminates 200m to the east as planned
>
thereby producing a short territorial overlap
> & projecting an
unnegotiated eastwest sector of bzgt
> directly west from gtne
>
upon which bz would actually lie directly north of gt
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.