url corrected below
apologies

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "acroorca2002" <orc@o...> wrote:
> further clarifications about the tripoint position
> based on this report dated last month
> http://belize.centramerica.com/noticias/detalle.asp?Id=643
>
> first
> the oas & various other parties have already verified the new
bzgt
> survey line in its entirety
> so
> a provisional marker of some sort does evidently already exist
> at the northernmost point
> or bzgtn
>
> also
> the parties are aware of the disjunction i anticipated below
> between this emergent bzgtn point & the old bzmxs point
> as already marked by the aguas turbias reference marker
> &
> this is indeed considered a problem to be solved
> &
> the mexicans are on record as wanting to be as helpful as
> possible in the whole process
> & will not stand in the way
> naturally enough
> considering that they stand only to gain a bit of land here
>
> so
> it already seems quite probable that the new bzgtn point will
> soon become recognized by mexico also as a new bzmxs
point
> & will thus soon become a fully tripartite tripoint
>
> > since mexico & belize are not known to have differed
> > about the position of the short northsouth survey sector of
bzmx
> > separating the mexican state of campeche
> > from the belizean district of orange walk
> > a line which still appears until now at least to have
terminated
> at
> > the same aguas turbias reference marker
> > then
> > unless mexico also agrees here to accept a similarly
> minuscule
> > land cession or concession from belize
> > the bzgtmx tripoint could well still remain fixed at aguas
turbias
> > while bzgt terminates 200m to the east as planned
> > thereby producing a short territorial overlap
> > & projecting an unnegotiated eastwest sector of bzgt
> > directly west from gtne
> > upon which bz would actually lie directly north of gt