Subject: Re: Berlin enclaves & territorial exchanges<br/>
Date: Jun 03, 2002 @ 16:25<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6659.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6671.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6642.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6659.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6661.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1362848690">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;lnadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@c...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Hi.  I&#39;m still reading.<br/>
&gt; To bring this back to earth, I&#39;ll only say we are descending into <br/>
 </span></blockquote>the <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; same kind of situation &quot;parsing&quot; positions just as the parties to <br/>
 </span></blockquote>the <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Berlin morass did under occupation.  <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>are you surprised your experience is already perceptibly conforming <br/>
to your own so deliberate thought & desire<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Where you wrote &quot;But I think you misinterpret the intention. There <br/>
 </span></blockquote>was <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; no inention to cease Soviet participation on the occupation of all <br/>
&gt; Berlin, and there was no such intention in this treaty.&quot;, I didn&#39;t <br/>
&gt; intend to say there was an intent to stop Russian participating in <br/>
&gt; occupation of all Berlin - I meant only in Steinstuecken.  <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>hahahahaha<br/>
hahahahahahaha<br/>
haha<br/>
whaattt<br/>
<br/>
 <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; With regard to the &quot;Polish sector&quot;, I owe you another map - you&#39;ll <br/>
 </span></blockquote>see <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; what I mean.  <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>shall we look for this on your website with the others len<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; Of course. But I think you are more pedantic than the treaty <br/>
 </span></blockquote>makers. <br/>
<br/>
wolfgang how could you<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; OK ... anyone still reading? :)<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; Regards<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; wolfgang<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>wolfgang you are very considerate<br/>
<br/>
& i realize you realize some of us are wishing to entertain the <br/>
entire discussion here on principle<br/>
yes & of course i at least deliberately ate the whole thing<br/>
burrrp<br/>
as i do whenever possible<br/>
owing to the specific nature of my interest in bp <br/>
messages 0001 thru 6660 inclusive<br/>
even when it goes bizarrely out of focus<br/>
in fact especially when it gets so weird<br/>
<br/>
& this is actually a very principled group<br/>
any appearances to the contrary notwithstanding<br/>
<br/>
so i agree<br/>
here it is well to wonder always about how well aimed one is<br/>
& therefore what ones desire actually is <br/>
& why one desires it<br/>
because we are so powerful in our creation & cocreation<br/>
& actually i think you are right at home with us already<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
my own feeling about berlin & the wall & the wars hot & cold etc is <br/>
that whatever misunderstandings & dissensions there were <br/>
are <br/>
so fortunately for us <br/>
in the past<br/>
<br/>
& not only that<br/>
they have nothing to do with our stated aim & purpose<br/>
<br/>
so my question for me & for you guys or anyone is<br/>
why dont we just leave them all there where they belong<br/>
rather than so willfully remaining under their influence<br/>
<br/>
m</div>