Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: just for example
Date: May 27, 2002 @ 20:55
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>From: "granthutchison" > ok i agree with everything you say & thats exactlythank you
>why i wrote in
> > the word animaniacs
> > which i considered easily the single most memorable aspect of this
> > little treatise
> > & thus the one i or anyone would normally use to search for it
> > or so i thought
>Fair enough, I suppose, if you are I wanted to retrieve it and could
>remember the unusual word. The link is taking a very long time to do
>nothing at all for me at present, so I don't know its content. And I
>don't know it's content because you haven't described it in your
>posting, so no-one can successfully search for content-related words
>like, say, "nation(s)".
>Of course the whole thing might be entertaining and otherwise
>effectively contentless, in which case "animaniacs" is its most
>salient property, and I withdraw my objection, your honour.
>ok but i would also like to emphasize that tho all this works fine for me &
> > but i confess i am astonished to be not only the odd man out but
> > mistaken as well in this case
> >
> > are you sure everybody is getting everything
>No, I'm sure everyone *isn't* getting everything - I'd only be
>inflicting all my data on everyone if I were including the files in
>my messages. But by putting them in the Files area, I'm trying to
>make the data available to *anyone* who wants it (without imposing it
>on anyone who doesn't want it).
>But I guess Bill can resolve this one. Is there a general level ofyes bill
>complaint and difficulty about retrieving files, Bill?