ok thanxx you guys for both opinions
& yes i too think the photographer is northeast of nimba
& that nimba is the height of land partly shown at right
but gbaam i dont see any sign of on either of your maps
nor anything that would necessarily have to show beyond nuon
so i am actually encouraged & holding firm with my guess
tho i dont mind if you can dissuade me
m
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "granthutchison" <granthutchison@b...>
wrote:
> > I think it's wishful thinking. According to Grant, when looking
in
> > this direction and standing on the spot where you think the
> > photographer is standing, after Mt. Nuon a Mt. Gbaam should
follow,
> > which is higher. The mountain in the background looks like the
last
> > one in the chain.
> I suppose, given the 200m contour interval, Nuon (as we're calling
> it) and Gbaam could be approximately the same height. Gbaam is
1385m,
> and black-triangle-Nuon could be 1400m without showing another
> contour loop. But the summit we're seeing in the picture looks
> several hundred metres lower than where the people on the col are
> standing. I think this view is likely to be SW beyond Gbaam or NE
> beyond Nimba - as you say, at the end of the chain.
>
> Grant