Subject: Re: cignlr map with corrected link<br/>
Date: Apr 04, 2002 @ 18:00<br/>
Author: granthutchison (&quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6096.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6107.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6062.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6097.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6099.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1990315218"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; I think it&#39;s wishful thinking. According to Grant, when looking in <br/>
&gt; this direction and standing on the spot where you think the <br/>
&gt; photographer is standing, after Mt. Nuon a Mt. Gbaam should follow, <br/>
&gt; which is higher. The mountain in the background looks like the last <br/>
&gt; one in the chain.<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I suppose, given the 200m contour interval, Nuon (as we&#39;re calling <br/>
it) and Gbaam could be approximately the same height. Gbaam is 1385m, <br/>
and black-triangle-Nuon could be 1400m without showing another <br/>
contour loop. But the summit we&#39;re seeing in the picture looks <br/>
several hundred metres lower than where the people on the col are <br/>
standing. I think this view is likely to be SW beyond Gbaam or NE <br/>
beyond Nimba - as you say, at the end of the chain.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>