Subject: Re: byruua<br/>
Date: Mar 11, 2002 @ 20:54<br/>
Author: ps1966nl (&quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5860.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5870.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic5821.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5861.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5863.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-290665468">m donner wrote:<br/>
&quot;(...)do you know if it is the actual tripoint marker (...)&quot;<br/>
<br/>
No, I don&#39;t, but the indication I get from this website is that it is.<br/>
<br/>
&quot;(...)or wasnt byruua a wetpoint (...)&quot;<br/>
<br/>
Not that I know. Not to say that it is...<br/>
<br/>
&quot;(...)i have lost track (...)&quot;<br/>
<br/>
I don&#39;t think that for this tripoint there is a track yet at BP. But <br/>
anyone who can prove me wrong and/or knows more about byruua, please <br/>
speak out.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>