Subject: Re: Continental Borders
Date: Feb 16, 2002 @ 18:59
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


dade city fl

hi franc

we have discussed this but your input is timely & gets to the whole
question better than ever before

i think it is fair to sum up our previous tries as follows

we found no official indices nor any compelling reasons to distinguish
the several socalled continents & their divisions

however
& just to underscore the artificiality of the entire matter
we did find that there is some consensus that the panama & suez canals
do the job best
as do the watercourses generally thereafter
& thirdly the international divides as in the aegean
& finally the heights of land as in the urals

the trickiest part of all has appeared to fall in the brief
segment between the ural river & the ural mountains
since the river doesnt fall precisely from the divide
& there it seems no objective standard can be found for drawing that
short sector of the line
but it hardly matters except among us enthusiasts

m

actually i stopped at the first computer i could find to give a report
as soon as i realized that the hamlet of lacoochee in the
withlacoochee forest has evidently been merged with the nearby hamlet
of trilby to form trilacoochee

anyway it seemed important & i guess thats right




--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "vandiest2000" <franc@v...> wrote:
> Hallo All,
>
> I am new to this group, and the question I have has probably been
> asked before.
> Are the continental borders defined, i.e. Europa/Asia
> border across the Ural Mountains, north to south
> further along the islands of Greece and the turkish main land
> How about the bits inbetween these ? Ural to greece-turky ?
> Is the egyptian Synai part of Africa or Asia ?
> Like to hear your ideas or pointers to where I can get this sort of
> information ?
>
> Regards
>
> Franc Van Diest
> franc@v...
> The Netherlands