Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Digraphs
Date: Jan 30, 2002 @ 16:00
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>From: "granthutchison" <granthutchison@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Digraphs
>Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:01:42 -0000
>
>Michael:
> > all very well put jesper
>Yes indeed.
>
> > there is more to it
> > which we have been experimenting with
> > & i will explain all that if anyone is really interested
>Me me. I'm really interested.
>And some summary of this should end up in the file area at some time,
>so that newbies and old hands alike can refer to it. Maybe now is the
>time to formalise what has up to now been informal?
>
>And lest anyone think I was earlier trying to poo-poo the system used
>here, I'd just like to take this opportunity to deny it hotly.
>I think some sort of combination of digraph(s) and direction is the
>slickest, most economical, way of expressing things, just as Jesper
>described.
>But I *was* trying to point out why folk like Ray and myself, who're
>used to FIPS, go completely and irremediably blank over ISO unless we
>pin a crib sheet above our monitors.
>(Hence, I suppose, my enthusiasm for a file-area crib.)
>
>Grant
>
>