Subject: Re: Report on Wlodawa visit<br/>
Date: Jan 02, 2002 @ 23:10<br/>
Author: ps1966nl (&quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5211.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic5209.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5211.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5213.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1850832340">Pepijn Hendriks wrote:<br/>
(...) it doesn&#39;t explain why they would have left out the number of <br/>
the border marker. <br/>
<br/>
There are more boundary markers without a number on that map. E.g. <br/>
1130 near the former railway bridge.<br/>
<br/>
A picture of this spot (regrettably without the marker, although the <br/>
author of this site mentions that there is one there) can be found at <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://strony3.wp.pl/wp/arturgarbacz/wlodawa.htm">http://strony3.wp.pl/wp/arturgarbacz/wlodawa.htm</a> (last picture - it <br/>
can be enlarged). It says here that the remains of the bridge pillars <br/>
can still be seen (look for the waves in the water - the pillars are <br/>
just beneath the water surface). The other side is Byelorussia.<br/>
<br/>
The dash-dot line constantly switching sides (of roads, rivers etc.)<br/>
is a common feature on many maps. It is mainly because of the <br/>
inability to superimpose two linear features on maps. The <br/>
Heringsbosch case is an extreme example in this respect. Rest assured <br/>
that the boundary in the Bug doesn&#39;t follow that line.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>