And the last part of
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/2370 (disregard
the idiotic subject line, the funniness of which was pointed out to
me by Michael at the time if I recall correctly).

Cf. also
http://secretary.state.gov/www/briefings/statements/1998/ps980912.html

Peter S.

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:

> Here are some links to former messages to the subject:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/2590
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/2614
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/2654
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: lnadybal
> To: BoundaryPoint@y...
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 5:26 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Dubrovnik Exclave of Croatia
>
>
> Does anybody have any details of the sea borders off the coast of
> Neum, Bosnia, that would make Dubrovnik NOT a detached piece

Croatia

> on the Adriatic coast?
>
> The seacoast at Neum was allowed to Bosnia to give it access to

the

> sea - and I'm wondering if its territorial waters give it access

> open seas without its vessels having to navigate

through "foreign"

> waters.
>
> Thanks
>
> LN
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.