Subject: Re: gbfrnl, evhritsi, cafr, etc<br/>
Date: Dec 08, 2001 @ 03:28<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4991.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4995.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4988.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4993.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4995.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1948747073">first i love titles like this so anything i can do to promote them i will but would also really like to say i still think prescott was very probably right when he offered that map & that the frnl border & maritime projection must have changed since then which is why i only imagined a frgbnl probability or rather was actually searching for a ghost theoretical frgbnl that certainly today looks entirely improbable i would agree m <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Peter:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; But the maps that I do find, sometimes have the <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; boundary turning point like on the map that you posted, but sometimes <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; they don&#39;t. An example of the latter is http://www.caribbean-on-<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; line.com/sm/smmap.shtml . I really don&#39;t know what is the truth here.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Yes, there&#39;s not a lot of consistency in the maps I&#39;ve seen. But from<br/>
<br/>
&gt; the point of view of the equidistance line, the dry turning point<br/>
<br/>
&gt; isn&#39;t that important - so long as the border reaches water along that<br/>
<br/>
&gt; SW-facing line of beaches, the equidistance line is going to trend SW.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Have you seen a map with the border reaching the western shore<br/>
<br/>
&gt; elsewhere? Prescott&#39;s equidistance line looks as if it must be taking<br/>
<br/>
&gt; its origin from the western tip of the island.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Grant </span></blockquote></div>