Subject: Re: More lax than US-Canada?
Date: Dec 07, 2001 @ 15:55
Author: bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


I disagree that it was worth replaying.
BJB

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "acroorca2002" <orc@o...> wrote:
> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Doug Murray, StockPhotosOnline"
<dmurray@s...> wrote:
>
> > How about a brand new one: The Southern Territories! Just think,
no more long line ups for we Canadians looking for cheap shoes and you
Americans looking for cheap CD's. Or perhaps we could form one big
country: USC. Hmmm... that's been taken. Dominion of North America?
>
> >
>
> > Wait: we'll be the kings of marketing and create: Jumbo: The
World's Biggest Country.
>
> >
>
> > Nothing like a dream...
>
> >
>
> > Doug
>
> > Prime President, Jumbo
>
> >
>
> > -------Original Message-------
>
> >
>
> > From: bjbutler@b...
>
> > Date: Thursday, August 02, 2001 05:54:06 PM
>
> > To: BoundaryPoint@y...
>
> > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: More lax than US-Canada?
>
> >
>
> > And which existing territory should America supercede? The Northwest
>
> > Territories, Yukon, or Nunavut?
>
> >
>
> > BJB
>
> >
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Doug Murray, StockPhotosOnline"
>
> > <dmurray@s...> wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Or rather, America could become either a) the 11th Province or b)
>
> > the 3rd Territory.
>
>
>
> a nice thread from last summer well worth a replay
>
> but didnt you guys know canada already has 4 territories
>
> yukon nunavut & northwest plus the crown or federal coastal waters
aka territorial seas aka national maritime territory
>
> which itself comes in 4 separate instalments or areas tho few people
can find them all
>
> m