Subject: Re: the elusive frgbnl et al<br/>
Date: Dec 07, 2001 @ 05:00<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4976.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4978.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4967.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4976.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4978.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-78348045">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Peter: <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; Although <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; it would be silly to give France a 200 nm long corridor, at the end <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; of which it _still_ doesn&#39;t reach high seas. But this _is_ the <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; www.maritimeboundaries.com situation!<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Surely a corridor has to have *something* at the other end? Otherwise<br/>
<br/>
&gt; it would be a &quot;tongue&quot;.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; The St P&M area shown on www.maritimeboundaries.com looks like a<br/>
<br/>
&gt; sliver taken from the equidistance solution given by Prescott -<br/>
<br/>
&gt; denying St P&M its equidistance dues in the Cabot Strait, but still<br/>
<br/>
&gt; pinching it off into a triangle by virtue of the concave Newfoundland<br/>
<br/>
&gt; coast behind it.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Grant<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>i agree the shape of peters stp&m map & several others i have seen always make this eez look so odd that it almost has to have been negotiated or rationalized in some weird way<br/>
<br/>
yet what equidistance dues do or would st pierre & miq have all the way over in cabot strait which is between canada & canada<br/>
<br/>
& i also agree it would be & is silly or even crazy but i would think true<br/>
<br/>
m</div>