Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Close encounters of the quadri-county kind<br/>
Date: Dec 03, 2001 @ 22:54<br/>
Author: m donner (&quot;m donner&quot; &lt;maxivan82@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4891.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic4891.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4891.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4893.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1298917853"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;From: &quot;Jack I am not entirely happy with the northeast corner<br/>
&gt;of Colorado situation.  That area of CO and adjacent<br/>
&gt;NE is not available on Topozone at 1:25000 which<br/>
&gt;would greatly clarify it if and when it becomes<br/>
&gt;available.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>jack<br/>
please be entirely happy anyway in the meantime<br/>
& i will also search nebraska statutes<br/>
<br/>
this should be a barn burner of a megapoint if we ever do validate it<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;Re the 15 ft. misalignment in Iowa, can you identify<br/>
&gt;the location for me.  I may have missed that close a<br/>
&gt;mis-match in one of the 36 that I found in Iowa.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>you wont believe this but i think it was a butler<br/>
<br/>
however i need to recheck my pix & memories<br/>
<br/>
but actually i had the feeling at several of iowas megapts that that entire <br/>
state may have been similarly loose in their definition of county lines<br/>
& i probably dont need to remind you that iowa appears to lead the nation <br/>
including even texas in probable quadricounty point count<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
_________________________________________________________________<br/>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp">http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp</a></div>