Subject: Re: Antarctic palindrome list<br/>
Date: Nov 26, 2001 @ 00:37<br/>
Author: orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)<br/>
<a href="4697.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4711.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4659.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4698.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4700.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1774135023">thanx dan<br/>
<br/>
glad you could drop in<br/>
<br/>
& please do again whenever about whatever<br/>
<br/>
we are especially looking forward to your pal ii to learn if there will be any new rivers that flow in both directions<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., dtilque@n... wrote:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; & i noticed a few rare if not new names in your results that<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; might even interest some advanced collectors i know<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; By advanced collectors, I think Mike means me. My interest in <br/>
<br/>
&gt; palindromes is towards a collection of them called the Palindromicon. <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Or rather the Palindromicon II which is to be published next year. It <br/>
<br/>
&gt; will have 4224 palindromic words or terms. <br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; But only one definition of each will be included. So we (Jeff Grant, <br/>
<br/>
&gt; who is not on the Internet but did the first edition of the <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Palindromicon, and myself) are only interested in palindromes we <br/>
<br/>
&gt; don&#39;t already have. None of those in the short list posted are new to <br/>
<br/>
&gt; us, though.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; If you want to send me your entire list, fine. However, right now I&#39;m <br/>
<br/>
&gt; in the middle of proofreading the text for Palindromicon II, and I&#39;m <br/>
<br/>
&gt; not sure if any new ones will be added at this stage.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; --<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Dan Tilque </span></blockquote></div>