Subject: Re: Antarctic palindrome list<br/>
Date: Nov 26, 2001 @ 00:24<br/>
Author: dtilque@nwlink.com (dtilque@...)<br/>
<a href="4670.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4699.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4659.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4696.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4698.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1006644080"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; & i noticed a few rare if not new names in your results that<br/>
&gt; might even interest some advanced collectors i know<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>By advanced collectors, I think Mike means me. My interest in <br/>
palindromes is towards a collection of them called the Palindromicon. <br/>
Or rather the Palindromicon II which is to be published next year. It <br/>
will have 4224 palindromic words or terms. <br/>
<br/>
But only one definition of each will be included. So we (Jeff Grant, <br/>
who is not on the Internet but did the first edition of the <br/>
Palindromicon, and myself) are only interested in palindromes we <br/>
don&#39;t already have. None of those in the short list posted are new to <br/>
us, though.<br/>
<br/>
If you want to send me your entire list, fine. However, right now I&#39;m <br/>
in the middle of proofreading the text for Palindromicon II, and I&#39;m <br/>
not sure if any new ones will be added at this stage.<br/>
<br/>
--<br/>
Dan Tilque</div>