Subject: Re: Black Sea maritime treaties<br/>
Date: Oct 23, 2001 @ 17:34<br/>
Author: Grant Hutchison (&quot;Grant Hutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4216.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4226.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4195.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4219.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4221.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1771605682">Martin:<br/>
Thanks for the information.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; The two lines do not quite<br/>
&gt; meet - there is a gap of 10&quot; of latitude and 5&quot; of longitude between<br/>
&gt; their terminal points - but both agreements contain provisions for<br/>
&gt; adjusting the final section of the boundary<br/>
 </span></blockquote>This fits with a UN document I found about the Bulgaria-Turkish <br/>
treaty, which specified that definition of the precise termination of <br/>
the boundary awaited negotiation of the Bulgaria-Romania maritime <br/>
border.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; the map on the Veridian website is misleading.<br/>
 </span></blockquote>This is the second time I&#39;ve found negotiated boundaries marked on <br/>
that map where no treaty seems to exist. There&#39;s an odd little box in <br/>
the Caribbean, I think surrounding Seranilla Banks in the north of <br/>
Colombia&#39;s maritime claim. The area is also claimed by the USA, and a <br/>
US government website dated later than 1998 (the date on the <br/>
maritimeboundaries map) states that no agreement has been reached. <br/>
But the map shows the area completely bounded by multilateral <br/>
agreements.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>