Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Jungholz Treaty translation - all of it<br/>
Date: Oct 10, 2001 @ 18:54<br/>
Author: Harry ten Veen (&quot;Harry ten Veen&quot; &lt;pa8km@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4058.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4065.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4041.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4058.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4060.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-590119508"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; With these tools<br/>
&gt; at our disposal there is really no excuse<br/>
 &gt;..&lt;<br/>
&gt; to include anything other than the most relevant extracts of previous<br/>
&gt; correspondence in our replies.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>An other big advantage of not including the (complete) text of the previous<br/>
message is<br/>
when searching the archive (own or at BP).<br/>
<br/>
You might get many hits, but there is a big change that they concern the<br/>
included message!<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
The (Yahoo) advertisements should be cut off the text to be included, at all<br/>
the times!<br/>
<br/>
gl<br/>
Harry ten Veen</div>