>From: "m donner" <maxivan82@...>
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>CC: barbaria_longa@...
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] testing yet another multisovereign message
>Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 19:02:48 +0000
>
>jesper
>come on
>whats dkvnmx
>was that the whole joke
>
>
>
>grant
>i am never sorry in reality
>nor do i believe are any of us
>which is why i told that joke
>but the point is i do appreciate your work
>
>
>
>brian
>re mnndsd
>i cant believe you are blaming your hi tech props again
>but anyway i think most probably
> either the usgs is still right in bus&ss
> most likely
> or the usgs is right on the paper topo
> less likely
> but they could know something we dont
> even if they dont know they do
>
>& your question about whether the original 1891 tripoint position still
>falls in the river in 2001 is a good & hard one
>because there is evidence on several usgs topos of both avulsion & army
>engineering all over this river
>but especially at this location
>
>& any coincidence of river & mnndsd at this late date would be purely er
>coincidental
> yet quite possible i admit
>
>however my own best available measurements & recall at this time dont seem
>to me to offer much hope of such an exact coincidence
>
>
>yadda yadda
>but still it may all matter when it comes to making this point
>which is still looking like a very probable virgin to me
>
>
>& re 4 corners of the north
>your point shattering 680 simoleons should stand up ok
>at least until bill & i strafe the 5 corners of the south with that
>czechoslovakian mig rental from marathon
>right bill
>
>
>& bill
>if this message works
>then we have already succeeded at least in part
>
>m
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp