Michael, why do you consider that the "likeliest probability"?? I think it
is far more likely that Biger was not aware of the rather odd situation,
and that he applied the common procedures for dividing international
waterbodies to Lake Constance.
I trust Barry Smith's information much more than I trust Gideon Biger's
book!
David
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Michael Donner wrote:
>
> also please consider the likeliest probability
>
> which is that gideon in 1997 must have been aware of trilateral
> documentation for this precise atchde position or wouldnt have reported
> it as such
>
> data of which our other informants may not have been aware when these
> conflicting or merely outdated facts were reported by or thru them
>
> whenever that originally was
>
> for we dont have the original date of this assertion by barry smith nor
> of his sources etc
>
> m
>
> >From: "Peter Smaardijk"
> >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: one last itch to scratch re atchde
> >Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:50:00 -0000
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
> width
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>