Subject: clarification Re: [BoundaryPoint] cnkgkz<br/>
Date: Oct 21, 2006 @ 17:51<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="20125.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic20125.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="20125.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="20127.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-344350971">tho this doesnt change the basic tripoint positional<br/>
identification below<br/>
nor at all resolve or illuminate the 1000 meter<br/>
elevation discrepancy<br/>
i have in fact subsequently found the lost higher peak<br/>
of the khan tengri massif at google earth some 5km<br/>
west of the tripoint peak<br/>
<br/>
so there isnt quite so much of a mystery here as i<br/>
first thought & reported<br/>
<br/>
--- aletheia kallos &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; second best available map<br/>
&gt;<br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/K-44A.jpg">http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/K-44A.jpg</a><br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; & best available map<br/>
&gt;<br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Khan%20Tengri/khan%20tengri.jpg">http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Khan%20Tengri/khan%20tengri.jpg</a><br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; appear to agree in placing cnkgkz at a ridge<br/>
&gt; junction<br/>
&gt; & 6832m high secondary peak of the 6995m high khan<br/>
&gt; tengri massif<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; & tho google earth reveals the height relationship<br/>
&gt; of<br/>
&gt; these 2 peaks as being just the opposite<br/>
&gt; oops<br/>
&gt; & moreover gives elevations about 1000m lower than<br/>
&gt; the<br/>
&gt; topos do<br/>
&gt; yikes<br/>
&gt; it is still clear that google earth has placed the<br/>
&gt; trijunction on the correct massif<br/>
&gt; & thus that the attached tripoint stretching diagram<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; which was made with the help of the google earth<br/>
&gt; contour features<br/>
&gt; has indeed fastened upon & reached the correct peak<br/>
&gt; &<br/>
&gt; true summit<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; __________________________________________________<br/>
&gt; Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
&gt; Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam<br/>
&gt; protection around <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a> <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>