Subject: cnkgkz<br/>
Date: Oct 21, 2006 @ 17:24<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@yahoo.com&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="20126.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic20125.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="20124.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="20126.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-238869560">second best available map<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/K-44A.jpg">http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/K-44A.jpg</a><br/>
& best available map<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Khan%20Tengri/khan%20tengri.jpg">http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Khan%20Tengri/khan%20tengri.jpg</a><br/>
appear to agree in placing cnkgkz at a ridge junction<br/>
& 6832m high secondary peak of the 6995m high khan<br/>
tengri massif<br/>
<br/>
& tho google earth reveals the height relationship of<br/>
these 2 peaks as being just the opposite<br/>
oops<br/>
& moreover gives elevations about 1000m lower than the<br/>
topos do<br/>
yikes<br/>
it is still clear that google earth has placed the<br/>
trijunction on the correct massif<br/>
& thus that the attached tripoint stretching diagram <br/>
which was made with the help of the google earth<br/>
contour features<br/>
has indeed fastened upon & reached the correct peak &<br/>
true summit<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>