Dear Mike,
I hope you will excuse if I do not reply to your usual eloquent
soliloquy. We all know that you are the smartest person on earth and
it would be horribly foolish to even try to argue with your supreme
intellect.
Verily, everything you write is truthful and wise to an extent
incomprehensible to us simple human beings.
Amen.
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>
wrote:
>
> thanx anton good idea
> & it is true that members may discuss anything they
> like here at bp
> tho i believe these curious notions of destruction &
> blasting are original with you
>
> &
> since i am pleased to have been at cause
> front & center
> in the creation of both these fine groups you are
> referring to
> i can tell you boundarypoint has always been devoted
> pure & simple
> to the
> a c t i v i t y
> of multipointing
> & indeed to the specifically multidimensional
> p u r s u i t
> of happiness
> rather than just to multipoints
> as you still seem to believe
> let alone to many or any other
> t h i n g s
> as you still seem to hope
>
> for the action of finding the many in the one is the
> only thing here
> nor has there ever been any change in our focus
> sudden or otherwise
>
> & if you will reread carefully & impartially the
> entire description you have selectively distorted here
> below
> i think you may finally come to agree & relax about
> this
>
> but it is also true that our aim has gotten better
> here thru the years
> & that our focus has actually been sharpening ever
> since & thanx to our creation & promotion of the
> spinoff groups
> where different interests have been expressly invited
>
> so really we are creating the best of all worlds
> & destroying nothing
> so far as i can see
>
> --- Anton Zeilinger <anton_zeilinger@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris,
> >
> > you've summed up quite nicely the destructive
> > effects of a single
> > person's actions, who suddenly decided that
> > BoundaryPoint would be
> > about a single issue, namely "multipoints" (contrary
> > to the group
> > description which says "as well as boundary related
> > interests including
> > general boundary issues, multipointing, boundary
> > cartography and
> > boundary photographs") and blasted everyone who
> > dared to be of a
> > different opinion. Ironically this person himself
> > had participated in
> > numerous other discussions in the beginning of
> > BoundaryPoint, all
> > before changing his opinion.
> >
> > I suggest to you and all other interested readers
> > who want to discuss
> > general boundary issues to join
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BorderPoint
> >
> > and leave BoundaryPoint to the person who submits 99
> > % of its post
> > anyway.
> >
> > Cheerio,
> > Anton
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > "borisinamerica"
> > <borisinamerica@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I do not understand this group. All you seem to do
> > is argue about
> > > content, write funny and the same person posts
> > almost all the messages
> > > (or most of them).
> > >
> > > Sad and boring.
> > >
> > > Boris
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>