Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: something or other
Date: Oct 16, 2006 @ 13:34
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> The more hahas you spew, the more evident your=== message truncated ===
> retreat is and the more
> grandiose your self denial. Trouble is, it isn't
> funny, because I'm
> not your only victim. You just don't know when or
> how how you hurt
> people, do you? In that I know you can't admit
> anything, I'll end
> this before it costs your other victims any more
> on-line money.
> LN
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia
> kallos <aletheiak@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > hahahahaha
> > you are the consummate victim of all my atrocities
> > hahahahahaha
> >
> > --- "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Did I think you were complaining? Yes, and in a
> > > most belittling way.
> > > I also thought, rightly so, that you were once
> > > again demonstrating
> > > your lack of people skills - your inability to
> > > perceive what things
> > > you write generally sound like to others as
> > > evidenced by the retreats
> > > that come every time you are called on
> something.
> > > Straighten up and
> > > have a care.
> > > LN
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia
> > > kallos <aletheiak@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hahaha
> > > > but did you think i was complaining
> > > > hahahaha
> > > >
> > > > on the contrary len
> > > >
> > > > it is you who are complaining
> > > > of my atrocity
> > > > hahahahaha
> > > > as well as not paying attention
> > > > as you freely admit
> > > > & so no problem
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > all i am commenting on here below & again now
> is
> > > how
> > > > far off target you obviously are in offering
> this
> > > > posting to boundarypoint
> > > >
> > > > & understandably so
> > > > in view of your proud disregard for our actual
> > > topic
> > > >
> > > > & i have no complaint with that
> > > > nor with you
> > > > nor with your doing that or being that way
> here
> > > > nor with your being here
> > > >
> > > > in fact i couldnt be happier here
> > > > with you or without you
> > > > on target or off
> > > >
> > > > indeed
> > > > just being in such a fine & pointy place makes
> me
> > > > independently happy
> > > > as i see it does for many others too
> > > >
> > > > perhaps even for you sometimes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > so please do be as disregardful as you like
> > > >
> > > > for it really doesnt matter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & yet
> > > > at the same time
> > > > when you are so off target in a place
> expressly
> > > > devoted to taking fine aim at a clearly stated
> &
> > > very
> > > > fine & very rare & very special objective
> > > > & to then evaluating the relative success of
> such
> > > fine
> > > > tries
> > > > you may & probably should expect some
> > > correspondingly
> > > > fine feedback to that effect
> > > >
> > > > for there really is a point to boundarypoint
> > > > i assure you
> > > >
> > > > & you can certainly deny it & or try to blunt
> it &
> > > or
> > > > complain about it
> > > > or about the way someone else relates to it or
> to
> > > you
> > > >
> > > > but that doesnt make it go away or become less
> > > fine
> > > >
> > > > for this fineness & specialness is all we have
> > > really
> > > > agreed to by being here together
> > > >
> > > > we have agreed we are interested in a special
> > > category
> > > > of fine targets
> > > >
> > > > the multipoints
> > > >
> > > > & we take aim at & evaluate our successes at
> > > hitting
> > > > these targets
> > > >
> > > > & there is no complaint when someone misses or
> > > even
> > > > slobbers
> > > >
> > > > not even when they miss so hideously as you
> almost
> > > > always seem to do
> > > >
> > > > but it still does give rise to the usual
> > > evaluations &
> > > > causes a bit more hilarity than usual in some
> > > cases
> > > >
> > > > so rest assured you are enormously
> entertaining
> > > > to me at least
> > > > whether you mean to be entertaining or
> > > multipointing
> > > > or not
> > > >
> > > > --- "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm rarely confused and almost never lost.
> I'm
> > > > > always "disregardful"
> > > > > of everything contained in your atrocious
> > > wordiness,
> > > > > however, so you
> > > > > might consider saving on capital letters
> with
> > > > > someone else. If anyone
> > > > > else were to complain, then I'd pay
> attention.
> > > But
> > > > > for you, if you
> > > > > don't like my presence, you know where the
> > > > > deregister button is.
> > > > >
> > > > > LN
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > "aletheiak"
> > > > > <aletheiak@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yikes but are you sure you just came back
> in
> > > to
> > > > > the right place len
> > > > > >
> > > > > > for i think you may either be confused
> about
> > > or
> > > > > disregardful of our
> > > > > topic & us again
> > > > > > seeing as boundarypoint is actually
> devoted to
> > > > > multipointing
> > > > > > rather than abandoned harbor leases or any
> of
>