hahaha
but did you think i was complaining
hahahaha
on the contrary len
it is you who are complaining
of my atrocity
hahahahaha
as well as not paying attention
as you freely admit
& so no problem
all i am commenting on here below & again now is how
far off target you obviously are in offering this
posting to boundarypoint
& understandably so
in view of your proud disregard for our actual topic
& i have no complaint with that
nor with you
nor with your doing that or being that way here
nor with your being here
in fact i couldnt be happier here
with you or without you
on target or off
indeed
just being in such a fine & pointy place makes me
independently happy
as i see it does for many others too
perhaps even for you sometimes
so please do be as disregardful as you like
for it really doesnt matter
& yet
at the same time
when you are so off target in a place expressly
devoted to taking fine aim at a clearly stated & very
fine & very rare & very special objective
& to then evaluating the relative success of such fine
tries
you may & probably should expect some correspondingly
fine feedback to that effect
for there really is a point to boundarypoint
i assure you
& you can certainly deny it & or try to blunt it & or
complain about it
or about the way someone else relates to it or to you
but that doesnt make it go away or become less fine
for this fineness & specialness is all we have really
agreed to by being here together
we have agreed we are interested in a special category
of fine targets
the multipoints
& we take aim at & evaluate our successes at hitting
these targets
& there is no complaint when someone misses or even
slobbers
not even when they miss so hideously as you almost
always seem to do
but it still does give rise to the usual evaluations &
causes a bit more hilarity than usual in some cases
so rest assured you are enormously entertaining
to me at least
whether you mean to be entertaining or multipointing
or not
--- "L. A. Nadybal" <
lnadybal@...> wrote:
> I'm rarely confused and almost never lost. I'm
> always "disregardful"
> of everything contained in your atrocious wordiness,
> however, so you
> might consider saving on capital letters with
> someone else. If anyone
> else were to complain, then I'd pay attention. But
> for you, if you
> don't like my presence, you know where the
> deregister button is.
>
> LN
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> <aletheiak@...> wrote:
> >
> > yikes but are you sure you just came back in to
> the right place len
> >
> > for i think you may either be confused about or
> disregardful of our
> topic & us again
> > seeing as boundarypoint is actually devoted to
> multipointing
> > rather than abandoned harbor leases or any of the
> other topics you
> are again describing
> > here
> >
> > & our actual group description
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
> > has always made this focus of ours quite clear
> > & still does
> > it seems to me
> > even tho it has often been innocently overlooked
> > as well as deliberately ignored
> >
> > & the extrinsic subjects you keep bringing back
> here may well have
> been addressed here
> > at one time & may very well have been left unended
> here too
> >
> > but that is because they were misdirected here in
> the first place
> > & are still misdirected here when they return
> >
> > i hope you do find your way to wherever you
> thought you were & think
> you are or meant to
> > go tho
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A.
> Nadybal" <lnadybal@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just came in to report on a subject previously
> addressed here that
> > > was left un-ended. Those of you who remember
> Wolfgang Schaub might be
> > > happy to hear he never let loose on the topic
> and secured and
> > > translated the polish text of the treaty between
> CZ and PL on the
> > > harbor lease. It lasted only about 12 years
> from 1947, after which
> > > the Czechs abandoned it. The area was comprised
> of a particular dock
> > > and adjacent land in the duty free portion of
> the harbor, and the
> > > treaty contained provisions allowing the Czechs
> to further occupy a
> > > separate exclave a short distance from the main
> portion. The treaty
> > > actually states that the area would be called
> (from Polish to German
> > > to half English), Czechoslavakian "Gebiet"(a
> word discused here
> > > earlier, too) in the Customs Excluded Territory
> of Stettin Harbor (or
> > > similar).
> > >
> > > A news article from the time, which he also
> found and translated,
> > > reveals that Czechoslovakia never was able to
> secure the rights in
> > > Stettin from the Germans that were accorded to
> it in the Versailles
> > > Treaty after World War I.
> > >
> > > Regards to all
> > >
> > > Len Nadybal
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com