Subject: bggrmk<br/>
Date: Oct 03, 2006 @ 16:51<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@yahoo.com&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="20059.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="20061.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2022850729">so <br/>
returning to the preset itinerary & to english<br/>
alphabetical orderliness<br/>
we reach bulgaria at last <br/>
<br/>
& in fact bggrmk first<br/>
<br/>
the quite decent even if slightly improbable topo<br/>
depictions<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/6083">http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/6083</a><br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/5217">http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/5217</a><br/>
make it look like the summit of mt tumba is the<br/>
tripoint<br/>
<br/>
so the attached best guessed tripoint stretching<br/>
diagram simply homes in on that point by means of the<br/>
google earth contour feature<br/>
<br/>
this btw is another case in which the google earth<br/>
altitude reading<br/>
specifically 1847m here<br/>
disagrees with the best available received truth <br/>
namely 1880m per the topos <br/>
by a few percent<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>