Subject: Re: SV: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU
Date: Oct 01, 2006 @ 13:19
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> No other markers were found.<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12>
>
> But it was an awfull wet day, and we were tired
> after a week on the road.
>
> It's a very accessable place in central Europe so I
> am surprised nobody else
> actually explored it also.
>
> Jesper
>
> _____
>
> Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] På
> vegne af aletheia kallos
> Sendt: 30. september 2006 19:22
> Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU
>
>
>
> i agree
> it looks like a belu marker to me also
> & i too place it in belgian territory
> since it is in the crotch between the befr & belu
> streams
>
> but what it is actually witnessing is the end of
> belu
> naturally enough
> it seems to me
> & not the end of befr
> which also happens to end there
> it is true
> but probably has a different terminal marker nearby
>
> so it doesnt strike me as strange at all
>
> in fact i think you reported some other markers in
> the
> neighborhood
>
> --- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette.
> <mailto:jesper%40nicolette.dk> dk>
> wrote:
>
> > I think Harry argument was something in line with
> it
> > being the wrong marker
> > on the wrong territory.
> >
> > If the confluence is the tp, the marker is in BE,
> so
> > if the marker is a FRLU
> > marker is is strange - it does appears to be a
> BELU
> > marker
> > (http://www.nicolett
>
> e.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12&c2=87>
> >
> <http://www.nicolett
>
> e.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=12&c2=87><http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9339>
> > &c2=87) . I
> > think the FRLU are concrete blocks.
> >
> > Jesper
> >
> > --
> > Borderbase - your online guide to international
> > borders and tripoints
> > http://www.nicolett
> <http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase> e.dk/borderbase
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > Fra: BoundaryPoint@
> <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:BoundaryPoint@
> <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com] På
> > vegne af aletheia kallos
> > Sendt: 29. september 2006 22:40
> > Til: BoundaryPoint@
> <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU
> >
> >
> >
> > great
> > i will of course stand by for any further
> > clarifications from europe
> > but looking on from this side of the pond
> > & so long as we still havent seen any of the 3
> > treaties
> > your newly added & in fact best available map
> > enlarged
> > here
> > http://article.
> >
> <http://article.
>
> gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9339>=== message truncated ===
> >
> gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9339
> > does show the tripoint precisely at the stream
> > confluence
> >
> > & no matter if we can or cant yet pinpoint it on a
> > satpic really
> >
> > nor that we cant yet identify the name of this
> tiny
> > tributary creek
> >
> > for i do think we have at last nailed it on the
> > ground
> >
> > --- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette.
> > <mailto:jesper%40nicolette.dk> dk>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I agree, satpic too unclear.
> > >
> > > On GCEBE 2001 we had much discussion of the
> actual
> > > tripoint, as Peter's map
> > > showed BEFR parallel with the stream. Parallel
> > with
> > > BEFR stream goes a
> > > fence, which could have been the true border.
> But
> > we
> > > all know maps are not
> > > made for freaks and some times borders are known
> > to
> > > be off the line to show
> > > other features.
> > >
> > > Harry seemed to believe the marker was the
> actual
> > > tripoint. Not sure of the
> > > argument. Maybe he can explain again.
> > >
> > > Jesper
> > >
> > > --
> > > Borderbase - your online guide to international
> > > borders and tripoints
> > > http://www.nicolett
> > <http://www.nicolett
> <http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase>
> e.dk/borderbase>
> e.dk/borderbase
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > Fra: BoundaryPoint@
> > <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> > yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:BoundaryPoint@
> > <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> > yahoogroups.com] På
> > > vegne af aletheia kallos
> > > Sendt: 29. september 2006 18:50
> > > Til: BoundaryPoint@
> > <mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com>
> > yahoogroups.com
> > > Emne: Re: [BoundaryPoint] BEFRLU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > bravo again
> > > this is a new state of play here if i am not
> > > mistaken
> > > http://lb.wikipedia
> > > <http://lb.wikipedia
> > <http://lb.wikipedia
> <http://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:3L>
> .org/wiki/Image:3L>
> > .org/wiki/Image:3L>
> > > .org/wiki/Image:3LännereckRodange01.jpg
> > > or at least it is for me
> > >
> > > for if i am reading the above pic correctly
> > > then we are looking at a much more pronounced
> > stream
> > > confluence than i had previously supposed
> existed
> > > there
> > >
> > > for it now seems to me that the river chiers
> > > carrying
> > > the belu convergent across the foreground is
> being
>