Subject: atczde retry
Date: Sep 26, 2006 @ 18:00
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@yahoo.com>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>are
> yes & this is a case where arturs new czech satpix
> much clearer than the google earthyou
> & indeed actually show some clearings
>
> so have a better look for the right stuff here if
> likeand
> http://mapy.seznam.cz/
> to confirm or improve
>
> --- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@...>
> wrote:
>
> > This difficult ATCZDE is based on personal visit
> > location in a clearing.but
> >
> > Jesper
> >
> > --
> > Borderbase - your online guide to international
> > borders and tripoints
> > http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] På
> > vegne af aletheia kallos
> > Sendt: 16. september 2006 05:36
> > Til: boundarypoint@yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: [BoundaryPoint] atczde if not also atchde
> > dont forget atczsk inin
> > between
> >
> >
> >
> > it was easy to decide atczde comes before atchde
> > alphabetically as soon as i realized that that is
> > fact the order observed by the magicallymysterious
> > borderbase itinerarybuttressed
> >
> > moreover this reverse logic & method are
> > bythe
> > the madness we have already been practicing from
> > very start of the tourafghanistan
> > in our special preference & promotion of
> > as in afas
> > ahead of andorra as in ad
> > & our quiet demotion of the united arab emirates
> > inrather
> > ae
> > not merely until after afghanistan but even beyond
> > ukraine
> > not to mention the totally unwarranted favoritism
> > extended toward algeria as in dz
> > thanx only to the spelling of its english nickname
> > etc
> > etc
> >
> > yikes
> >
> > but happily we can do whatever we like
> > & are doing just that
> > here in oesterreich
> > as in at
> >
> > which is why we have wound up at atczde next
> > than atchdeon
> >
> > both of which btw
> > tho scarcely pronounceable as well as semantically
> > vacuous
> > to the best of my knowledge
> > must at least rhyme equally well with cratchity
> >
> > & all this on a rather overcast day for a satpic
> > the one handon
> > & at an impossibly wet place to even try to find
> > the other<http://geoportal.cenia.cz/mapmaker/cenia/map/?wiz_id=21&wiz_special_param=&
> >
> > but for starters if not also enders
> > check out the first of the attached tripoint
> > stretching diagrams
> >
> > the best available czech zoomable map
> > http://geoportal.
> >
>
> >rect=-920000:-1260000:-420000:-910000?=cz&PHPSESSID=&win_size=2>
>
> >cenia.cz/mapmaker/cenia/map/?wiz_id=21&wiz_special_param=&rect=-920000:-1260
>
> > 000:-420000:-910000?=cz&PHPSESSID=&win_size=2mouse
> > places atczde smack on a ridge saddle
> > & i was able to grope this point down with my
> > atmiddle
> > hence the location of the little red tripoint
> > stretching square in the midst of otherwise
> > completely
> > opaque woods
> >
> > & as for atchde
> > the hypothetical equidistance tripoint in the
> > of lake constanceby
> > well i suppose we could measure & compute it from
> > scratch
> > but you may recall we do already have a reasonably
> > good fix on it
> > that was picked up from a tactical pilotage chart
> > grant hutchisonbeside
> > so we could well be content to just plot that
> > the google version for nowin
> > in view of the fact that it will undoubtedly fall
> > the middle of nowhere anywayin
> > & like why fuss any more than minimally necessary
> > this especially imponderable casegoogles
> >
> > so
> > converting grants values to degminsec
> > i get
> > n lat 47d32m21s31 & e long 9d33m35s40
> > & have expressed that preliminary guess on the
> > second
> > attachment
> > just as a possible alternative to jespers &
> > guesses__________________________________________________
> > & in the hopes that someone might find a way to
> > improve on us all
> >
> > so thats that
> > or really thats them
> >
> > & so next will come lucky atczsk
> > between atczde & atchde
> > alphabetically
> > but also doubling back to some extent
> >
> > & then we will again be completely where we are