In front of tent.

He=is

Borderbase - your online guide to international borders and tripoints

http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase

Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af aletheia kallos
Sendt: 26. september 2006 15:51
Til: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Emne: Re: SV: [BoundaryPoint] arbocl still looking fat because zapaleri summit is elusive

yikes but is he the name of the marker

or do you mean he
as in here
or he
as in hehe
or just he
as in he

my transsexagenarian eye makes him out as a tent

he is clearly at a high place in jujuy

--- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette. dk>
wrote:

>

My placemark is strangely placed on the slope of the

> hill. I guess GE

may

> have adjusted the terrain. I will adjust
>

accordingly.

>
> I wonder if this is actually the tp marker he on

the

> last picture on
>

http://www.geocitie s.com/Pipeline/ Dropzone/ 4246/jujuy1. htm

>
> Jesper
>
> --
> Borderbase - your online guide to

international

> borders and tripoints
>

href="http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase">http://www.nicolett e.dk/borderbase

>
>
> _____
>
> Fra:

href="mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@ yahoogroups. com

>

[mailto:BoundaryPoint@ yahoogroups. com] På

> vegne af aletheia kallos
> Sendt: 13. september 2006

16:26

> Til:

href="mailto:boundarypoint%40yahoogroups.com">boundarypoint@ yahoogroups. com

>

Emne: [BoundaryPoint] arbocl still looking fat

> because zapaleri summit

> elusive
>
>
>
> satpic attached with best

guessed tripoint

> stretching
> diagram as usual
>
>

but the difficulties here are far greater than usual

>
> for one

thing

> a contour examination & elevation probe by mouse
>

revealed there are at least 2 competing peaks on the

> massif
>

several miles apart

>
> & for another
> no adequate

geocoords could be found to settle the

> matter
>
> &
> the published elevations for this peak dont agree
>

either

>
> & moreover these are at least 130 feet higher

than

> any
> i was able to grope out at google earth
>
> the last of these obstacles to certainty may be
> disposed of by

my growing suspicion & surmise that

> google earth isnt nearly as

accurate with altitudes

> as
> it at least seems to be with

latitudes & longitudes

>
> & i mention this because these

elevation readings

> arent the first such surprising ones i have
>

encountered with my mouse probes

> when compared to published summit

elevation data

>
> i would even go so far as to suggest that

the

> elevation readings on google earth may be nearly as
>

unreliable as the border depictions

> except
> these could still

turn out to be off the mark by a

> fixed percentage of the truth
>

& thus

> unlike the borders
> easily convertible &

correctible

>
> &
> i can sidestep all the other

objections for the time

> being too
> at least in my own

mind

> by noting that the position i have selected &
> indicated

by the little red square does in any case

> at
> least appear to be

slightly higher than any & all

> the
> other candidates i could

find

>
> still
> please take this particular guess with a

larger than

> usual dose of salt
> especially coming right on the

heels of my dead

> certainty at aonazm
> at least until the data

become more reliable

>
>

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __

>

Do You Yahoo!?

> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>

protection around

> http://mail. <

href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail. yahoo.com> yahoo.com

>
>
>

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail. yahoo.com