Subject: de facto canada denmark tartupaluk tripoints north & south<br/>
Date: Sep 19, 2006 @ 23:38<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="19935.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19937.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-100999855">that would be cadktan & cadktas in normal beepyese<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=3ee12855-0a73-4399-82ab-3bb28eb586af">http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=3ee12855-0a73-4399-82ab-3bb28eb586af</a><br/>
or points 123 & 122 respectively as indicated here<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nares_strait_border_%28Kennedy_channel%29.png">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nares_strait_border_%28Kennedy_channel%29.png</a><br/>
which are on the shoreline at low tide<br/>
<br/>
so tartupaluk may be a country without territorial<br/>
seas but a country nonetheless<br/>
<br/>
also<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.sikunews.com/art.html?artid=1909&catid=5">http://www.sikunews.com/art.html?artid=1909&catid=5</a><br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://gov.tu.net/gateway.htm">http://gov.tu.net/gateway.htm</a><br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://gov.tu.net/eng/tartupaluk.htm">http://gov.tu.net/eng/tartupaluk.htm</a><br/>
etc<br/>
 <br/>
but anyone who is concerned that this claim might<br/>
actually hold up should note the telltale admission<br/>
that was made by the guys father in the unexpurgated<br/>
8th paragraph here<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=140ed8c1-671c-4e8b-9762-621f93c3d8f0&k=89506">http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=140ed8c1-671c-4e8b-9762-621f93c3d8f0&k=89506</a><br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>